CP-4(3)—Automated Testing
>Control Description
Test the contingency plan using ⚙organization-defined automated mechanisms.
>Supplemental Guidance
Automated mechanisms facilitate thorough and effective testing of contingency plans by providing more complete coverage of contingency issues, selecting more realistic test scenarios and environments, and effectively stressing the system and supported mission and business functions.
>Assessment Interview Topics
Questions assessors commonly ask
Process & Governance:
- •What formal policies and procedures govern the implementation of CP-4(3) (Automated Testing)?
- •Who are the designated roles responsible for implementing, maintaining, and monitoring CP-4(3)?
- •How frequently is the CP-4(3) policy reviewed and updated, and what triggers policy changes?
- •What governance structure ensures CP-4(3) requirements are consistently applied across all systems?
Technical Implementation:
- •Describe the specific technical mechanisms or controls used to enforce CP-4(3) requirements.
- •What automated tools, systems, or technologies are deployed to implement CP-4(3)?
- •How is CP-4(3) integrated into your system architecture and overall security posture?
- •What configuration settings, parameters, or technical specifications enforce CP-4(3) requirements?
Evidence & Documentation:
- •What documentation demonstrates the complete implementation of CP-4(3)?
- •What audit logs, records, reports, or monitoring data validate CP-4(3) compliance?
- •Can you provide evidence of periodic reviews, assessments, or testing of CP-4(3) effectiveness?
- •What artifacts would you present during a FedRAMP assessment to demonstrate CP-4(3) compliance?
Ask AI
Configure your API key to use AI features.