AC-4(9)—Human Reviews
>Control Description
Enforce the use of human reviews for ⚙organization-defined information flows under the following conditions: ⚙organization-defined conditions.
>Cross-Framework Mappings
>Supplemental Guidance
Organizations define security or privacy policy filters for all situations where automated flow control decisions are possible. When a fully automated flow control decision is not possible, then a human review may be employed in lieu of or as a complement to automated security or privacy policy filtering. Human reviews may also be employed as deemed necessary by organizations.
>Assessment Interview Topics
Questions assessors commonly ask
Process & Governance:
- •What formal policies and procedures govern the implementation of AC-4(9) (Human Reviews)?
- •Who are the designated roles responsible for implementing, maintaining, and monitoring AC-4(9)?
- •How frequently is the AC-4(9) policy reviewed and updated, and what triggers policy changes?
- •What training or awareness programs ensure personnel understand their responsibilities related to AC-4(9)?
Technical Implementation:
- •Describe the specific technical mechanisms or controls used to enforce AC-4(9) requirements.
- •What automated tools, systems, or technologies are deployed to implement AC-4(9)?
- •How is AC-4(9) integrated into your system architecture and overall security posture?
- •What configuration settings, parameters, or technical specifications enforce AC-4(9) requirements?
Evidence & Documentation:
- •What documentation demonstrates the complete implementation of AC-4(9)?
- •What audit logs, records, reports, or monitoring data validate AC-4(9) compliance?
- •Can you provide evidence of periodic reviews, assessments, or testing of AC-4(9) effectiveness?
- •What artifacts would you present during a FedRAMP assessment to demonstrate AC-4(9) compliance?
Ask AI
Configure your API key to use AI features.