Under active development Content is continuously updated and improved

SA-4(7)Acquisition Process | NIAP-approved Protection Profiles

IL5
IL6

>Control Description

(a) Limit the use of commercially provided information assurance and information assurance-enabled information technology products to those products that have been successfully evaluated against a National Information Assurance partnership (NIAP)-approved Protection Profile for a specific technology type, if such a profile exists; and (b) Require, if no NIAP-approved Protection Profile exists for a specific technology type but a commercially provided information technology product relies on cryptographic functionality to enforce its security policy, that the cryptographic module is FIPS-validated or NSA-approved.

>DoD Impact Level Requirements

No specific parameter values or requirements for this impact level.

>Discussion

See NIAP CCEVS for additional information on NIAP. See NIST CMVP for additional information on FIPS-validated cryptographic modules.

>Related Controls

>Assessment Interview Topics

Questions assessors commonly ask

Process & Governance:

  • What acquisition policies and procedures address the requirements of SA-4(7)?
  • How are security and privacy requirements integrated into the acquisition process?
  • Who is responsible for ensuring that acquisitions comply with SA-4(7)?

Technical Implementation:

  • How are security requirements defined and documented in acquisition contracts?
  • What mechanisms ensure that acquired systems and services meet security requirements?
  • How do you validate that vendors and service providers comply with specified security controls?

Evidence & Documentation:

  • Can you provide examples of acquisition documentation that includes security requirements?
  • What evidence demonstrates that acquired systems meet security specifications?
  • Where is acquisition security documentation maintained throughout the system lifecycle?

Ask AI

Configure your API key to use AI features.